Unsurprisingly, I awoke to a disappointing response from the Debian bugs team. The email was sent privately so I wont post it here, but it boils down to “nah man, this is normal”. On a whim, I have therefore asked the Debian TC if they have a policy on quality and correctness review of patches inserted by Debian into upstream software:
On the recommendation of a friend on a business themed social network, I have just sent the following email to owners@bugs.debian.org about my experiences on the Debian bug tracker recently. It will be interesting to see if anything comes of it.
So… a really really long time ago I wrote a small set of PNG utilities called pngtools. They’re not particularly complicated or anything, but a few distros decided to package them, including Debian (and therefore Ubuntu), Gentoo, Mint, and so forth. I’ve talked previously here about resurrecting the old subversion commit history and attempting to modernize the code.
And then something weird happened. A couple of weeks ago a github issue was filed against pngtools. The entire bug report is a single sentence pointing to the Debian bug tracker where people are being… weird. I think perhaps I accidentally overlapped with two things — a slightly entitled user, and people who appear to “karma farm” by pushing bug reports from Debian upstream with the minimum possible level of detail. Certainly when I look at the github history for these users they do not have a good hit rate for reporting bugs which actually result in a fix upstream. I am unclear on why they would be doing this thing if their goal isn’t either to acquire a fix or to earn some sweet sweet made up internet points.