Avoidance behaviour, or, wanted: video RSS feeds

I’m avoiding doing paper work for work, and chapter edits for the MythTV book by writing a video aggregator. I have Media RSS feeds working, and normal RSS 2.0 with enclosures working. I have two questions:

  • Are there any other feed formats I should worry about?
  • What are some good (as in not horribly boring) feeds that I should now watch?

That’s right, I built the aggregator, before I had anything to aggregate. Now I have this hammer, and must hit things with it… I’ll talk more about the aggregator itself when I’ve done a little more testing, but I think it’s pretty cool.

On freely available guide data

One of the flaws with Microsoft’s Media Center flavour of Windows XP when it was released in Australia, was that it suffered from the same inherent flaw as every other PVR option in Australia. No guide data. It really says something about Australia’s television networks that they don’t want to help people with even vaguely modern computing setups watch their content — it’s a situation which reminds me a lot of the RIAA’s stand over tactics, and I think it’s equally doomed.

That’s one of the joys of my MythTV setup in the US — the guide data is trivially available in return for doing a simple four or five question survey every three months or so. What could be easier than that?

Well, when I was using a TiVo in Australia the OzTiVo folk had a solution to these problems, and were working with the XMLTV / MythTV people to make it more generic. I hadn’t been paying much attention to it until today when I was randomly surfing on the topic, but it’s interesting to see that they also now provide instructions for how to import their guide data into a Windows Media Center PC. It’s cool to see a community driven project which is so OS agnostic, and seems to be getting the job done. If you have a TiVo, MythTV box, or a Windows Media Center PC you should be thanking the kind folks who enter all this guide data.

Oh, and you should be helping them keep the data up to date. It would seem to be a case of enlightened self interest to work on the shows that you want to be accurate because you want to watch them for instance.


I’ve often wondered where the modern media find their pundits. For example, asking someone who is described as a Luddite by a listener about Google seems like an awfully odd way to run a radio station. So, how do people like the ABC find folks to interview? Do they just Google for them? Is there a pundit school? Are the pundits sending press releases and actively selling themselves (that final one would strike me as a certain indicator of bias).